Apologize or face lawsuit, Wynne tells Brown

Wynne Sudbury Bribery Trial
ADDS ID OF JANE ROUNTHWAITE Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne (front), accompanied by her partner Jane Rounthwaite (right), arrives to appear as a witness in the Election Act bribery trial in Sudbury, Ontario, Wednesday, Sept. 13, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

TORONTO – Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne has asked the leader of the Opposition to retract comments he made about her or face legal action.

The premier’s lawyers wrote a letter to Patrick Brown on Wednesday, saying the Progressive Conservative leader had told reporters that Wynne was standing trial in a Liberal bribery case. The letter said Wynne is not on trial or even under investigation, but is rather offering voluntary testimony and co-operating with the court process, therefore Brown should retract the comments and apologize.

Wynne’s office made the letter public moments before the premier took the witness stand in a trial in Sudbury, Ont., for two former Liberal staffers who are facing bribery charges under the Election Act.

“She has gone so far as to waive her parliamentary privilege and will voluntarily appear as a witness at the trial, ” wrote the premier’s lawyer, Jack Siegel.

“There is a world of difference between this high level of co-operation and your defamatory reference to ‘when she stands trial’; she is not on trial, and will continue to take all necessary measures to defend her reputation.”

Brown made the comments on Tuesday when reporters asked him to comment about the Sudbury trial. He said the government was using “legislative tricks” during debate at Queen’s Park to avoid answering questions about the court proceedings.

“I hope that the premier will give us answers, maybe when she stands trial,” he said. “That in itself is astonishing, that we’ve got a sitting premier, sitting in trial answering questions about these allegations of bribery, that in itself is astonishing of (how) far this government has fallen.”

Brown was not available for comment. His office did not contest the leader’s remarks, but pointed out that he immediately tried to clarify them when speaking to the media.

PC deputy leader Steve Clark said the Liberal government was trying to distract from the premier’s testimony, which he called “an unprecedented situation”.

“The government issued a press release before the premier testified,” Clark said. “There will probably be other government announcements that will distract from the case. I’m not surprised.”

Clark said the matter would be dealt with by lawyers from both sides.

This is the second time in a week that the Liberal government has threatened legal action over remarks made by a Progressive Conservative member of the provincial legislature about the Sudbury trial. Last week, Bill Walker told a local radio station Wynne was under investigation and facing charges in connection with the bribery trial. Days later, he issued a statement apologizing for the remarks.

Deputy premier Deb Matthews denied Tory suggestions that the government was trying to distract from the Sudbury trial.

“No, Patrick Brown is a lawyer,” she said. “He knows that what he said was inappropriate. He knows he said it in a very, very public forum. I don’t know why he didn’t immediately correct the record.”

McMaster University political science professor Henry Jacek said the lawsuit threat is basic political strategy, an attempt to correct the record immediately from the government. It’s also not without precedent in politics but the cases rarely seem to actually go to court, he said.

“They want to get a message out to people that … this is not true,” Jacek said. “In this case, they decided that a lawsuit was the best way to do it. I see it more as political communication tactic than a legal tactic even though it is a legal instrument.”


  1. Perhaps the population including the sheep in this city should accept the responsibility of her being in power. This is Orazetti’s legacy and everyone of you who voted for him should remember that.

  2. the phrase ‘defend her reputation’ stands out. When your well earned reputation is for being mean spirited, corrupt and incompetent how is it possible to defend it.

    • The thieving, lying, and crooked Wynnedbag should be in jail, she has squandered billions of our tax money without any consequence.
      Funny how there are two different laws for them and us.

Comments are closed.