Little substance behind Doug Ford’s populist message, but he may still win: experts


TORONTO — Doug Ford’s bold promises of government belt-tightening during the last Progressive Conservative leadership debate may win over some of the party’s grassroots, but experts and critics say there isn’t much substance behind his populist message.

Ford, one of four candidates running to succeed Patrick Brown at the helm of the province’s official Opposition, has repeatedly touted his experience as a business owner and former Toronto city councillor in painting himself as the only one equipped to curb reckless spending at Queen’s Park.

In the last of two televised debates before the party selects its new leader, the politician and brother of the late former Toronto mayor Rob Ford vowed to free up billions of dollars by eliminating waste, which he said he achieved at city hall.

Ford, along with his leadership rivals Christine Elliott, Caroline Mulroney and Tanya Granic Allen, have struggled to explain exactly how they will replace an estimated $4.3 billion in revenue that would have come from the carbon tax they have all pledged to axe.

“I don’t believe we need to cut any jobs, I don’t believe in taking food off people’s table,” he clarified in a news conference after the debate Wednesday night. “We’re going to find efficiencies…and that’s how we’re going to save the money, just like we did in the city of Toronto.”

The Liberals were quick to scoff at his promise Thursday, calling it a sign that Ford — who came out ahead in a recent poll on the Tory leadership race — doesn’t understand how government works.

“It’s obvious to me that he does not know what he’s talking about. Those are big big numbers, they mean real cuts to services that Ontarians rely on,” said Liberal legislator Deb Matthews. “That is just magical thinking because those dollars represent jobs.”

Experts, meanwhile, say Ford’s achievements during his single term on city council fall dramatically short of his claims, and while his everyman approach may draw staunch support from the so-called Ford Nation, it’s unclear how that would play out in a general election.

Ford may have been a “force behind the throne” during his brother’s tenure as mayor, but even so, the pair “accomplished very little,” said Nelson Wiseman, a political science professor at the University of Toronto.

Despite being largely hamstrung by council, who blocked most of the pair’s plans, the Ford administration did manage to save a few million dollars by privatizing garbage collection in one part of the city, Wiseman said. But those savings amounted to “loose change” in the city’s budget, he said.

What’s more, municipal and provincial politics operate under completely different systems and Ford hasn’t proven himself when it comes to Ontario policy, Wiseman said.

“Ford is not familiar with the issues, he just has this mantra, ‘I’m going to save money,’ but give us some specifics,” he said.

“He’s full of hot air, but that doesn’t mean he won’t get elected.”

Ontario has not been particularly receptive to populist messaging so far, though that approach has gained traction in some suburban and rural pockets of the province, said Barbara Perry, a sociology professor at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology.

Even among Tories, it does not always play well, Perry said, pointing to Ford’s late father as an example. Doug Ford Sr. was a backbencher under former Progressive Conservative premier Mike Harris and was not taken very seriously, she said.

Still, Ford has “centre stage” in the leadership race, she said. Should he take command of the party, he would have a shot at becoming premier, because populist voters are loyal and motivated, she said.

“It’s really about personality as much as it is policy for him. That bombast,” Perry said.

“The challenge that’s going to play out here is that there’s so much disillusionment with (Ontario Premier Kathleen) Wynne to the point it’s almost a case of ‘anyone but.’ … The issue will be if the voter turnout is low, but his supporters are more tenacious.”

Progressive Conservatives begin voting on their new leader on Friday and the winner will be announced March 10.

Paola Loriggio and Michelle McQuigge, The Canadian Press


  1. liberal legislator deb matthews states,“It’s obvious to me that he does not know what he’s talking about. Those are big big numbers, they mean real cuts to services that Ontarians rely on “. deb matthews has spoken, from her self-imposed perch, and we are suppose to agree with her and her side-kick wynne. Yes indeed, her and her liberal government know best, who have taken this province to the poor house. And these libs think that is just fine. Folks, these libs are not done spending your taxpayer dollars. Head’s up, 3 more months of liberals wasting your hard-earned money for their personal gain, that’s right, ….. your vote on June 7 !!!

  2. Ford would be a loose cannon who would end up no better than Wynne. He can barely speak without a script.

  3. So the critics are upset because they don’t see how he can find the money to take the place of the carbon tax revenue? That’s easy……don’t spend the money you don’t have in the first place, just like before the tax lol. Trust me……..there is a LOT of fat to be cut in government budgets. They’re afraid of him already because like his brother……it was done and done successfully whenever they could muster the votes. They claim it was chump change……but it was still more than anyone else managed even when everyone was against him on city council. Anyone in Canada NOT running for budget streamlining should never be considered. If your elected officials can’t even follow a simple budget how can they manage a country?

Comments are closed.