Sara McCleary’s statement on the Ferrochrome Production Facility

36

I’ve lived my whole life in the Sault.  I’ve seen the city change, sometimes for good and sometimes for worse.  But we always keep moving on and we always remain hopeful for the future.  That’s why I’ve chosen to raise my two children here. I want to stay close to my roots, in an ever-changing city that grows at the heart of the Great Lakes, surrounded by beautiful northern forests.

I want to see my city prosper and do well. I’m invested in it.  I believe the ferrochrome plant is an opportunity to bring jobs to the Sault and therefore feel it would be irresponsible to object to the project before having seen the results of an environmental assessment. I can’t in good conscience support a project that will put us all at risk for any number of jobs. I’ve said this from the start of this process, sharing these thoughts before in my column.

It’s essential that every new project follows a thorough environmental assessment, to ensure high environmental and sustainability standards. That assessment must be done by an independent third party that will give us an honest idea of what this project will mean for our environment and our health.

In the 1990’s, local NDP MPP Bud Wildman brought us the Ontario Environmental Bill of Rights. The Liberals pushed back on it and the Conservatives under Mike Harris even got rid of it. My point is that the NDP has always been serious about protecting our environment while helping the workers get a better deal.  That hasn’t changed.

We need assurance that the plant will have the highest environmental standards and the best technology to be in place to ensure arduous monitoring.  That means we also need a federal and provincial government that will step up to enforce better standards. Liberals and Conservatives have giving too much leeway to big polluters. The NDP will make sure standards are up to date and big polluters are not able to buy their way out of them.

You can count on me to work with our municipal and provincial representatives, as well as the plant owners, to include the community in the decision making process. I believe that the engagement and approbation of the local residents and First Nation communities is essential for this project to move forward.  This needs to be a partnership with the plant owners and the community, so everyone is able to share their thoughts and concerns. It is paramount that the community gives its approval for the project to go forward and I expect Noront and all the other partners in this project to come out and hear peoples’ concerns before making any other commitment to anyone.

The health and safety of workers and people living around the plant, as well as our environment, cannot be compromised. My family and I live next to the steel plant and I understand the concerns that come with a development of that nature so close to our homes.

Sara McCleary
NDP candidate for Sault Ste. Marie

This media release has been edited at author’s request since its original posting as follows:

We mistakenly stated that “In the 1990’s, local NDP MPP Bud Wildman brought us the environmental assessment provincially.  The Liberals pushed back on it and the Conservatives under Mike Harris even got rid of it.”

Some of that information was not accurate and we want to correct it to “In the 1990’s, local NDP MPP Bud Wildman brought us the Ontario Environmental Bill of Rights.”

36 COMMENTS

  1. As we heard today, regardless of environmental assessments, the location of the plant is not suitable to protecting the millions who draw drinking water from the Great Lakes. So, where will the smelter be relocated?

  2. i am not for the plant at this point but how can we all make a truely EDUCATED opinion without hearing both sides…WE CANNOT!!!..I am not a follower i will make my 100% true opinion when i hear both sides… we must keep this in mind people..be your own person and let both sides speak..thats the right thing to do in all situations in life!!

  3. I agree with what she has said..why cant we let the process come and hear from the assessments, yes we want to be heard but why cant we hear from them and let them be heard…i think not letting the company speak isnt fair..i am leaning more towards not wanting the plant but i do want to hear what Norant has to say also….after i hear both sides ..only then i will make up my mind..till then i’m on the fence about this…being educated about the whole picture then making final statements on my view.. is the right thing to do…

  4. Impact! check out Finland’s ferrochrome plant that is settled on the sea coast not inland in a populated area. First step to ruin the great lakes and fishing and tourism. Has anyone checked with Sault Michigan as to the fall out of the dust and pollution how would the that town survive

  5. Sara will the assessment give us a 100 per cent guarantee that the cromimum 6 will not leach into Lake Superior, if not then that is not good enough. Just maybe look at building it away from our drinking water supply. We should not be gambling our water supply so Noront can have lower operating costs.

  6. Am thinking maybe there is a correlation between this Ferrochrome polluting facility and the City changing its Logo from Clean fresh waters and natural beauty of SSM to something discombobulated & cut- up new city logo which reflects no fresh water…hmmm, now im not too sure about voting NDP as she supports this ferrochrome plant

    • “Supports?” That is not what Sara stated. She made a responsible statement. A good representative must be responsible to everyone, must study an issue and in this case that includes seeing environmental assessments. She did state the conditions she would require to give support to this plant. She set that bar high, now let’s see if Noront is willing to rise to that level.

  7. Am thinking maybe there is a correlation between this Ferrochrome polluting facility and the City changing its Logo from Clean fresh waters and natural beauty of SSM to something discombobulated & cut- up new city logo which reflects no fresh water…hmmm, now im not too sure about voting NDP as she supports this ferrochrome plant

  8. Look what those windmills did for the beautiful forest outside of Sault Ste. Marie.
    We disturbed our wildlife and our recreation for snowmobiling and what kick back do we get from that project .. I haven’t seen my hydro go down ..
    they had meetings and studies for people to attend but we had nothing to say .. it was a done deal no matter what people said .
    I feel the same thing is happening with this plant .
    That’s my two cents .

Comments are closed.