Millroy: “Notice What?”

5

I don’t know how I missed it all these years.

I was asked this question by a passerby in Station Mall:
“With all your ramblings about the reworked pattern for traffic from East and Albert Streets leading to Wellington, have you ever taken a look at where traffic from Bay Street runs up Pim Street to Queen?”

I said I travel that route almost daily.

“And you never noticed?”

“Notice what?”

“It is exactly what was once the pattern at East and Albert leading to Wellington,” he said before walking on.

All I had ever noticed about this route was that with the completion of the reconstruction of Bay Street, the new marking dividing the lanes on Pim Street shortchanged the left lane in width

But going home this day I checked out what I had been told and found it hard to believe that all these years I could have missed what was pointed out to me and also that someone, anyone, hadn’t pointed it out to me much earlier.

The traffic configuration at Pim and Queen is exactly what was in play at East and Wellington Streets before the line painters from Guelph made an unsolicited change and the top echelon in traffic decisions with the city decided that, rather than have it corrected, they would go along with it.

To refresh the memory of anyone who hadn’t followed the controversy that began in 2015, for 50 or so years previous traffic in the left lane coming off Albert Street turned north on East Street where there was an easy split that allowed it to go either east or west on Wellington.

Traffic in the right lane on Albert could turn south on East Street or turn left to carry on up East Street to Wellington Street East.

That is exactly what is in play at Pim and Queen now.

Two lanes of traffic from Bay Street turn left onto Pim; both lanes carry on to Queen Street East but traffic in the left lane also can make a left turn to travel west on Queen.

What could be simpler?

Certainly not the mess the linepainters from Guelph gave us at East and Albert leading to Wellington.

I actually find it sad that I travelled the Bay Street route to Pim and Queen so many times and never noticed that it was a replica of what we once had at East and Albert leading to Wellington.

But what I find even sadder is that the talking heads at Public Works and Engineering Services, the department which oversees traffic patterns in the city, had to know it all along and allowed the botched configuration at East and Albert leading to Wellington to stand.

WITH THREE EXCEPTIONS, the 6-5 vote by council last week to provide $230,000 to allow electrical servicing to proceed on the proposed downtown plaza, even though financing for the project is a long way from being in place, saw the New Guard going up against the Old Guard.

The New Guard won.

Voting to surge ahead were first-term Councillors Corey Gardi, Lisa Vezeau-Allen, Donna Hilsinger and Luke Dufour. They were joined by Coun. Sandra Hollingsworth and Mayor Christian Provenzano, who cast the deciding vote.

Veteran Councillors Matthew Shoemaker, Rick Niro, Marchy Bruni and Paul Christian were joined by first-termer Matthew Scott in voting for a delay.

A story on saultonline said the delay was going to be only until Sept. 27, when a full report was to be before council for approval. The story said Tom Vair, Deputy CAO, Community Development and Enterprise Services, had indicated a delay wouldn’t put the overall project behind.

Actually, that’s too bad. Since the project is $1.4 million short in its financing, the Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation refusing to cough up the $2 million the city was asking of it, I believe everything should be put on hold until all funding is in place.
As it stands, if it goes ahead without this funding, we taxpayers are going to be on the hook for about $7 million when it only should have been about $5 million.

However, I don’t think this is going to stop some members of council, enough of them actually, from forcing this project through no matter the pitfalls.

Considering there appears to be so much opposition to the plaza, I would have preferred seeing it put on the ballot for the city election next year in the form of a pebiscite. Other than that, I suppose we will just have to take a run at those councillors who are pushing it on us.

CITY COUNCIL is inserting itself into the problem of speeding that seems to have been growing in this city over the past while.

Ward 3 Coun. Donna Hilsinger presented council with a motion calling for strategies that include reducing speed limits, implementing automated speed enforcement, improving road design and improving public transportation options as well as playing host to public engagement campaigns.

It is something we can all support, as most of us have noticed a decided uptick of speeding over the past year or two and nothing seems to have been done about it.
But Sue Pringle, a resident of the former Diplomat Motel property now owned by North 44, would like to see the plan stretched out a bit. She would like it to include better policing of extreme noise as well.

She says at times she can’t sleep because of the loud noise of motorcycles that tour the downtown, going round and round, revving needlessly when they stop at the lights on Pim. As well, she sai the bass from a stereo in one vehicle was so strong it knocked a mirror off the wall.

Pringle says she has called police but “they are no help whatsoever.”

 

5 COMMENTS

  1. When Mayor Provenzano got re-elected in 2018 he committed to COMPLETING Downtown Redevelopment as one of his 10 Priorities when he said:

    “[I / Our new Council will] Continue, complete and implement our downtown redevelopment plan. We have done a tremendous amount of work, capital planning and consultation to improve our downtown and we have taken the necessary steps to make it happen. You are seeing some of that this summer [of 2014] but more needs to be and WILL be done.”

    That was the only Priority that Mayor Provenzano committed to COMPLETING even though his 1st Priority was:

    “Continue to encourage and ensure responsible budgeting, SPENDING and tax policy.”

    I guess Mayor Provenzano, and the rest of City Council see this Downtown Plaza as “responsible budgeting, spending, and tax policy”?

    If Councilor Shoemaker sees himself as our next Mayor he will surely be able to convince 5 other Council Members to put this Downtown Plaza on the shelf until we taxpayers can more reasonably afford it. For goodness sake, Councilor Shoemaker already seems to have 4 other Council Members on his side!

    Besides, Mayor Provenzano already has a lot of significant accomplishments to point to during his tenure as our Mayor. He doesn’t need this Downtown Plaza. It really is a waste of our tax dollars at this time.

    Please lead this Council to shelving this Downtown Plaza, Councilor Shoemaker, if you really want to demonstrate you will be a Mayor who is committed to responsible budgeting and spending.

    Simply voting against the Downtown Plaza is not the kind of leadership I’m looking for in a future Mayor Councilor Shoemaker.

    I’m looking for you to get 6 votes against staff’s likely recommendation to continue with the Downtown Plaza just like Mayor Provenzano got 6 votes to go ahead with the PUC work last week.

    Show us what kind of Mayor and leader you will be Councilor Shoemaker.

    This Downtown Plaza project is important to Mayor Provenzano so talk it over with him, and see if there is something less confrontational that will allow both of you to shelve this project, and still put both you and Mayor Provenzano into a positive light heading into his final year in office, and your next run at elected office.

    Sincerely,
    Mark Brown

  2. What is the big deal about this plaza ?The amount of money being wasted for another Park is just a waste of taxpayers money .These millions should be donated to the new Treatment Centre on Old Garden River Road.
    W
    We have more pressing problems like the speeding on our streets .Over this plandemic Police have not been enforcing the Highway traffic act.

    We have build bicycle lanes to accommodate the cyclists.
    Riding on sidewalks seems to be a problem..The Bylaw should be amended to allowed this on busy streets .
    2Where cyclists need to dismount when incountering pedestrians .

  3. It’s amazing that they can find enough road to paint lines on at all after neglecting the majority of the roads for 40 years they are mostly bumps and adjoining potholes, yet the wacky out of control rogue mayor has downtown plaza on the brain. It seems that he has no interest in crime, drugs, the speeding problem or anything else that doesn’t fit his personal agenda.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here