Sudbury Police officer charged by OPP


The Ontario Provincial Police have charged a 47-year-old Greater Sudbury Police Services officer with resisting police and trespassing after an incident in Espanola.

The OPP release is as follows-

On September 26, 2021 members from the Manitoulin Detachment of the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) responded to the Espanola Recreational Centre regarding individuals who were trespassing on the property. OPP had attended earlier in the day and requested the individuals leave. The individuals returned to the property a short time later.

As a result of the investigation:

A 47-years-old from Espanola was arrested and charged with:

  • Resist Peace Officer contrary to section 129(a) of the Criminal Code, and
  • Enter Premises When Entry Prohibited contrary to section 2(1)(a)(i) of the Tresspass to Property Act (TPA)

A 39-year-old from Espanola was also arrested and charged with:

  • Enter Premises When Entry Prohibited contrary to section 2(1)(a)(i) of the TPA

The accused was released on an Appearance Notice and is scheduled to appear at the Ontario Court of Justice on November 15, 2021, in Espanola.

According to a report on CTV, Sudbury Police confirmed the 47-year-old was an officer on the force and has been placed on administrative leave.

The officer’s incident, which according to another media outlet, revolved around the vaccine requirements, was also forwarded to the Professional Standards Branch.

Stay with SaultOnline as we continue to bring updates on this situation as they become available.


  1. Update…I have knowledge….The only crime this woman was guilty of was being at the arena to watch her son play hockey…pretty bad when that is a crime

    • You may want to speak to whoever sold you that knowledge about getting your money back. The individual twice contravened Ontario Regulation 364/20 under the Reopening Ontario Act. Both contraventions were observed by an OPP officer. On the first instance they were issued a warning and the second time they were charged. They now have the choice of paying their fine or arguing their case in court.

Comments are closed.